Re:Lime shuts in 12 markets, lays off around 100
by derefr on Thursday January 09, 2020 @07:53PM
(#22007530)
It's just bikes. Mostly because they're valuable+standardized enough to be easily fenced, and yet not high-value enough for police to bother investigating. It's like leaving MacBooks sitting on street corners.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Lime shuts in 12 markets, lays off around 100
by conanbatt on Thursday January 09, 2020 @09:05PM
(#22007842)
My understanding is that bike theft is not prosecuted, even if you found someone that stole 1000 bikes.
If you stole 10 dollars from a bank, you can bet you are prosecuted. Bikes are just not defended as private property for some reason.
Re:Lime shuts in 12 markets, lays off around 100
by bobthepanda on Friday January 10, 2020 @12:35PM
(#22012794)
Bike chop shops that do that kind of volume do get prosecuted because it’s relatively easy to show that a place is selling a large volume of scrap metal from bikes.
It is much harder to prove that a thief is responsible for 1000 individual bike thefts, because you’d need evidence for each bike.
Re:Lime shuts in 12 markets, lays off around 100
by conanbatt on Friday January 10, 2020 @01:07PM
(#22013176)
Proving bike theft is as easy as honeypotting any bike. Its just no prosecuted. It's a cultural blindspot for what I think are probably historical reasons.
You can steal a car priced lower than a bike and get a year in jail. ITs not about the cost of proving anything, it's about the willingness of the institution to enforce it.