News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Glacier National Park to remove all 'glaciers will be gon... by awb on Thursday January 09, 2020 @04:37PM (#22006105)
Right but OC's comment still stands: state the uncertainty rather than project certainty.

"Glaciers are projected to disappear between 2020 and 2030 based on current emission trends" would still be alarming.

Re:Glacier National Park to remove all 'glaciers will be gon... by bavell on Thursday January 09, 2020 @04:45PM (#22006228)
Exactly, you don't need to twist the facts to maintain the degree of urgency. Just needs the right framing.

"This glacier likely won't survive long enough for your kids/grandkids to see themselves"

Re:Glacier National Park to remove all 'glaciers will be gon... by beerandt on Thursday January 09, 2020 @04:51PM (#22006278)
Well if we're going to still claim it's science, there needs to be a measurable range stated.

Being over ambiguous just to be right can be just as misleading as overstating certainty. (Think Nostradamus type claims.)