Re:Glacier National Park to remove all 'glaciers will be gon...
by bavell on Thursday January 09, 2020 @04:45PM
(#22006228)
Exactly, you don't need to twist the facts to maintain the degree of urgency. Just needs the right framing.
"This glacier likely won't survive long enough for your kids/grandkids to see themselves"
Re:Glacier National Park to remove all 'glaciers will be gon...
by beerandt on Thursday January 09, 2020 @04:51PM
(#22006278)
Well if we're going to still claim it's science, there needs to be a measurable range stated.
Being over ambiguous just to be right can be just as misleading as overstating certainty. (Think Nostradamus type claims.)
"Glaciers are projected to disappear between 2020 and 2030 based on current emission trends" would still be alarming.