News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Glacier National Park to remove all 'glaciers will be gon... by shadowgovt on Thursday January 09, 2020 @04:31PM (#22006028)
It's sad when people underestimate the amount of work that was done both to find a path through the threat of MAD-style militarization and the pressure of human population on the global food supply.

Neither of these worst-case-scenarios were avoided by chance. They were avoided by the hard work of decades of politicians and scientists.

The world was a single soldier executing a single order away from a superpower-scale nuclear launch at least one time (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-24280831).

Farming process improvement nearly tripled the yield of existing land in the past half-century (https://ourworldindata.org/exports/global-land-spared-as-a-r...).

We do people a disservice to assume that just because we didn't personally solve a problem, the problem either didn't need to be solved or wasn't solved by human effort.

Re:Glacier National Park to remove all 'glaciers will be gon... by beerandt on Thursday January 09, 2020 @05:23PM (#22006552)
I'd say the ww3 thing was exactly avoided due to chance.

It's also wrong to assume that improvements only happened because of dire threats. It's not like we haven't been trying to increase agricultural yields for thousands of years.

Re:Glacier National Park to remove all 'glaciers will be gon... by wolco on Thursday January 09, 2020 @04:41PM (#22006177)
I was part of securing the world against y2k.