Re:Glacier National Park to remove all 'glaciers will be gon...
by SlipperySeaCow on Thursday January 09, 2020 @04:30PM
(#22006017)
The fires are obviously much worse due to high temps
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Glacier National Park to remove all 'glaciers will be gon...
by throw_14JAS on Thursday January 09, 2020 @04:33PM
(#22006057)
It's less obvious that the high temps are caused by climate change. Directionally, it makes sense -- but how much of the delta temp is variation?
Re:Glacier National Park to remove all 'glaciers will be gon...
by bureaucrat on Thursday January 09, 2020 @04:34PM
(#22006077)
That could be your imagination. Australia's temperature is quite in the normal range, similar to that of 1960s.
https://weatherspark.com/h/y/149434/2020/Historical-Weather-...
https://weatherspark.com/h/y/149434/1960/Historical-Weather-...
Re:Glacier National Park to remove all 'glaciers will be gon...
by SlipperySeaCow on Thursday January 09, 2020 @04:40PM
(#22006145)
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/australia-n...
Hottest year on record for Australia was 2019 (just ended).
Almost 3 degrees F over average.
High temperatures dry things out and make them easier to burn
Re:Glacier National Park to remove all 'glaciers will be gon...
by jozzas on Thursday January 09, 2020 @05:02PM
(#22006375)
This is very, very wrong. If you want to cherry pick, I can too - literally days ago, western Sydney recorded its hottest ever temperature (48.9C, 120F). This is a region adjacent to where a number of fires are still burning.
2019 was Australia's hottest year on record.