Judge orders Google to turn over a full year of actor’s data

Re:Judge orders Google to turn over a full year of actor’s data by munk-a on Thursday January 09, 2020 @02:25PM (#22004568)

More optimally Google could decline to collect this information and would thereby be immune to any such requests.

When it comes to Gmail they could take an approach like password managers where the user's password is instrumental to decrypt the data and Google lacks any manner to circumvent the encryption - they just choose not to.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Judge orders Google to turn over a full year of actor’s data by greglindahl on Thursday January 09, 2020 @05:29PM (#22006591)

I would be all for Google not collecting this info -- that's what I've always done in my startups. Privacy by design is a great thing.

However, my point was that the comment I replied to was factually wrong -- there is legal action Google could choose to take instead of immediately complying.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Judge orders Google to turn over a full year of actor’s data by munk-a on Thursday January 09, 2020 @06:53PM (#22007160)

I agree and didn't mean to directly go against what you said - but I wanted to make sure it's highlighted and known that Google exposed themselves to this risk voluntarily.

[ Parent | on HN ]