News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:EPO and UKIPO Refuse AI-Invented Patent Applications by Eikon on Wednesday January 08, 2020 @07:08AM (#21990635)
There is none as the “I” in “AI” is a fallacy.

“AI” is like blockchain, mostly useless technology that wastes huge amount of resources where there’s almost always better and way simpler solutions except in very marginal use cases.

Re:EPO and UKIPO Refuse AI-Invented Patent Applications by ben_w on Wednesday January 08, 2020 @08:22AM (#21991164)
Headline(t=0): “AI $name beats humans at $task! The singularity is upon us!”

Headline(t=a): “AI $name isn’t real AI, because it’s just a $latest_buzzword.”

Headline(t=b): “AI doesn’t exist and never will. Humans are the best!”

Headline(t=c): “AI $name beats humans at $task! The singularity is upon us!”

I don’t deny there are plenty of buzzwords around — nor do I deny that AI/ML is glorified statistics with hopeful startups who don’t realise that outsourcing the training to Mechanical Turk won’t provide enough training data — but there are a lot of things that were introduced as AI and which have proven useful, including many things that are now regarded as the better and simpler alternatives to AI/ML.

Re:EPO and UKIPO Refuse AI-Invented Patent Applications by hvidgaard on Wednesday January 08, 2020 @07:52AM (#21990919)
That is entirely a matter of definitions of intelligence. If it's as in Strong AI, then we're nowhere near yet. But if it's as in limited scope better than humans, then we're very good.

Let's put the definition aside for a moment. Lets say we have a black box that doctors can put images into, and it will tell if there are areas that look like it might be cancer. Is that AI? Is it an AI if you can teach it what cancer look like?

Re:EPO and UKIPO Refuse AI-Invented Patent Applications by meddlepal on Wednesday January 08, 2020 @10:12AM (#21992086)
It's not AI, it's a dynamic programming algorithm.
Re:EPO and UKIPO Refuse AI-Invented Patent Applications by hvidgaard on Wednesday January 08, 2020 @10:56AM (#21992478)
Dynamic programming algorithm is a well defined and very specific term. This is not dynamic programming in any form.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_programming

Re:EPO and UKIPO Refuse AI-Invented Patent Applications by red75prime on Wednesday January 08, 2020 @07:31AM (#21990794)
> there’s almost always better and way simpler solutions

Given that automation hasn't took over all jobs, I suppose that the solution is "hire people to do it". Correct?