News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The senatorial governance of Bitcoin: making (de)centrali... by nullc on Tuesday January 07, 2020 @05:29AM (#21978680)
You might be asking a bit much of him, this technology stuff isn't super easy for everyone.

In two easy steps:

$ ./bitcoin-cli signmessage 1GMaxweLLbo8mdXvnnC19Wt2wigiYUKgEB "Digital signatures are to scammers as garlic is to vampires. I am hn user nullc, but you are not Bitcoin's creator."

$ ./bitcoin-cli verifymessage 1GMaxweLLbo8mdXvnnC19Wt2wigiYUKgEB "HJ0VgbIY9BAud6MiZ4Qh0KSwhmA7gwkFm07tjPJeHsYNcj5oIAVlVR2JnKTF7EjqTWEaD9QbAPzk8QII8QJxW4s=" "Digital signatures are to scammers as garlic is to vampires. I am hn user nullc, but you are not Bitcoin's creator."

true

Re:The senatorial governance of Bitcoin: making (de)centrali... by onesatoshi on Tuesday January 07, 2020 @09:23AM (#21980114)
Is that what you call privacy?
Re:The senatorial governance of Bitcoin: making (de)centrali... by askmike on Tuesday January 07, 2020 @04:30PM (#21985106)
No, Satoshi is enjoying privacy right now. But everyone claiming to be Satoshi isn't looking for privacy. If they want to convince tech audiences, proving their claims is the easiest way forward.