Re:Evidence that the key assumption made in discovery of dar...
by mannykannot on Monday January 06, 2020 @10:09PM
(#21976435)
I think there were a lot of chemists at that time who were confident that atoms are real, but an influential group of philosophically-minded physicists (Mach, for one) objected to the claim on the basis that the evidence was circumstantial. They gave Boltzmann a good deal of unnecessary grief over the matter (no pun intended).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Evidence that the key assumption made in discovery of dar...
by ncmncm on Monday January 06, 2020 @10:26PM
(#21976531)
Yes, all chemists suspected atoms were real, but they were mostly careful not to claim to have evidence for it that they did not, in fact, have -- yet! Nobody but nobody was surprised when we turned out to really have atoms. It was all a relief, but it didn't change much about how chemistry was conducted. It made catalysis easier to understand, and ultimately DNA as a physical basis for life that made biologists generally very uneasy. Many had thought of themselves as studying something divine, and had to get used to being chemists.