Re:Hobby x86 kernel written with Zig
by nimmer on Monday January 06, 2020 @06:28PM
(#21974729)
I used various modules with gc:none
I meant that new ARC GC, that will replace the current one, can be used for the kernel.
It's still a GC, technically, but, quoting Araq on ARC:
Nim is getting the "one GC to rule them all". However calling it a GC doesn't do it justice, it's plain old reference counting with optimizations thanks to move semantics.
I meant that new ARC GC, that will replace the current one, can be used for the kernel.
It's still a GC, technically, but, quoting Araq on ARC:
Nim is getting the "one GC to rule them all". However calling it a GC doesn't do it justice, it's plain old reference counting with optimizations thanks to move semantics.