Hobby x86 kernel written with Zig

Re:Hobby x86 kernel written with Zig by Mawr on Monday January 06, 2020 @05:34PM (#21974225)

Some food for thought: https://youtu.be/ZsHMHukIlJY?t=633

For example, this is the best way to define functions with argument lists long enough not to fit on a single line:

  fn doThing(
      argument1,
      argument2,
      argument3,
  ) {
      <code>
  }

Visually clear, doesn't have any spaces/tabs issues, produces minimal diffs when adding/removing/renaming arguments.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hobby x86 kernel written with Zig by Stratoscope on Monday January 06, 2020 @09:22PM (#21976139)

Very interesting talk! Thanks for the reference.

More food for thought:

The style in your example is more consistent with the way nearly every programmer formats code that has more than one statement. For example:

  if( shouldDoThings ) {
      doOneThing();
      doAnotherThing();
      doLastThing();
  }

Why do we want to format statements that way, but function calls and expressions a different way? No one would write this:

  if (shouldDoThings) {doOneThing();
                       doAnotherThing();
                       doLastThing();}

I have a theory about that but will have to save it for another day.

Somewhat related, the Rust coding style guidelines used to follow a heavily column-aligned style, but changed to indentation-only a year or two ago. I posted an example from the Servo source code with the old and new formats here:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18962177

[ Parent | on HN ]