Re:The McDonnell Douglas-Boeing merger led to the 737 Max cr...
by hannasanarion on Monday January 06, 2020 @04:29PM
(#21973544)
Who is flying commercial to get treated for life-threatening emergencies?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The McDonnell Douglas-Boeing merger led to the 737 Max cr...
by BurningFrog on Monday January 06, 2020 @06:51PM
(#21974952)
Think life-threatening non-emergencies.
Re:The McDonnell Douglas-Boeing merger led to the 737 Max cr...
by hannasanarion on Tuesday January 07, 2020 @08:58AM
(#21979900)
If travel is necessary for medical treatment, it ought to be covered by insurance, so the price shouldn't matter. Medevac flights, aka air ambulances, are a thing.
Re:The McDonnell Douglas-Boeing merger led to the 737 Max cr...
by blaser-waffle on Tuesday January 07, 2020 @09:41AM
(#21980285)
"covered by insurance" doesn't mean much if you're still billed $10k or more after insurance.
My father has decent insurance as a retiree and still got billed for an ambulance ride after he had complications following a jaw surgery.
I've seen a bunch of anecdotal stories about how it's cheaper for someone on the west coast to fly to Korea, or down to Mexico, for non-critical surgeries, spend a week recovering, and then fly home.
Re:The McDonnell Douglas-Boeing merger led to the 737 Max cr...
by hannasanarion on Tuesday January 07, 2020 @11:46AM
(#21981658)
I think it's a fair assumption that the US healthcare system would have been overhauled long before the complete elimination of the competitive market for commercial air travel, which is what this thread is about.