News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Hobby x86 kernel written with Zig by apta on Monday January 06, 2020 @01:32PM (#21971658)
> As someone who currently mostly programs in C++, lack of memory safety barely makes my top three concerns.

Isn't having a UB-free JVM a noteworthy goal though? Especially if it gets used in life-critical systems such as avionics or autonomous cars.

Re:Hobby x86 kernel written with Zig by pron on Monday January 06, 2020 @01:36PM (#21971707)
UB-freeness is not a goal in-and-of-itself. It's shorthand for a certain kind of technical (i.e. non-functional) correctness, which, in turn, is related in some ways to functional correctness, and it's improving functional correctness (and I include security here) that's the goal. Is the most effective way to achieve that is by working to completely eliminate undefined behavior? I'm not at all sure.