Re:Machine Learning Can't Handle Long-Term Time-Series Data
by tgflynn on Sunday January 05, 2020 @05:53PM
(#21964778)
> But when published his work fell on fertile ground.
I'm not sure how fertile that ground was. It was still 3 years after the year he basically laid the foundations of modern physics before he was able to get an academic job.
That "certain patent clerk" was hardly working in a vacuum; not only was he building upon the work of others (e.g. Lorentz just to pick someone) but he had been in school with some of them and was in constant communication with them, as he was hardly the only one working on the problem.
This is not to minimize his brilliance (Special Relativity in particular has that wonderful property of being completely obvious once explained...but that you could almost see before the explanation but yet nobody had previously characterized) and the mind blowing nature of his three-paper year. But when published his work fell on fertile ground.