Re:Rolling Stones tracks posted briefly on YouTube in attemp...
by goto11 on Sunday January 05, 2020 @04:34AM
(#21960494)
That would mean you could mix a single instrument or sound out of an existing recording, and now you own the copyright?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Rolling Stones tracks posted briefly on YouTube in attemp...
by thethirdone on Sunday January 05, 2020 @05:24AM
(#21960613)
I would think you instead would have copyright on the new bit that is mixed in, and because of that, the combined version as a whole still contains your copyright and therefore cannot be copied freely.
I don't think that would give you any new rights over the original work though.
Re:Rolling Stones tracks posted briefly on YouTube in attemp...
by pbhjpbhj on Sunday January 05, 2020 @06:53AM
(#21960873)
But perhaps crucially would give you effective financial control via online tools that look for a musical fingerprint?
If the public have the rights but can't exercise those unimpeded then the erstwhile rights holders get to retain the financial benefit and prevent full effective entry to the pubic domain.
Bastards.
Re:Rolling Stones tracks posted briefly on YouTube in attemp...
by colejohnson66 on Sunday January 05, 2020 @09:34AM
(#21961374)
I’ve heard stories of people uploading their old works to YouTube’s ContentID system so it will remove them from an old account they can’t access anymore.