News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I Was Google’s Head of International Relations by ethbro on Thursday January 02, 2020 @03:16PM (#21939346)
The intent was probably to expose people to prejudices they don't usually experience with their cis/white/male/wealthy selves.

In which case one would have wanted to have those people roleplay as minority identities.

The writeup's phrasing is definitely weird, if accurate. Not sure why people of color would need to be exposed to what it's like to be treated as "brown people"?

Then again... given the logic behind most HR training, I'd be unsurprised if someone misunderstood diversity training guidelines and instead tried to put people in "their groups." facepalm

Re:I Was Google’s Head of International Relations by Izkata on Thursday January 02, 2020 @06:11PM (#21940982)
"People of color" is the modern "black" (African heritage), and excludes dark skin colors from other locales. "Brown people", weird as it sounds as a phrase, is broader and includes dark-skinned groups like Middle-Eastern, but I think arbitrarily excludes Asian.
Re:I Was Google’s Head of International Relations by ethbro on Thursday January 02, 2020 @06:33PM (#21941169)
Really? I'm not sure that narrow of a definition is the commonly used one.

Wikipedia has it as even broader than my use: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Person_of_color

I've generally heard it as either "non-white", "non-white, with emphasis on 'brown' skin tones", or "non-white and not covered by a more specific group" in common real world use, depending on the context.