Re:Oslo had 0 pedestrian, 0 cyclist, 0 children and 1 driver...
by lolinder on Thursday January 02, 2020 @09:22AM
(#21935512)
The problem I've seen is that (especially in suburbs where pedestrians are rarer) drivers don't check for pedestrians. Almost every time I'm walking for any length of time I nearly get hit by a car that assumes that a green light means they're free to turn right without any restrictions. This isn't me intentionally creating an unsafe situation (often I'm already in the intersection), it's drivers who see so few pedestrians they're not trained to think of them.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Oslo had 0 pedestrian, 0 cyclist, 0 children and 1 driver...
by skripp on Thursday January 02, 2020 @11:54AM
(#21937020)
This is anecdotal evidence, but I moved from a european town of 200 000 to a mega-city of 20 000 000 and I've seen far fewer incidents here during the last 5 years than the first 30 in my old hometown combined.
Re:Oslo had 0 pedestrian, 0 cyclist, 0 children and 1 driver...
by isoskeles on Thursday January 02, 2020 @11:40AM
(#21936864)
This is my impression as well, having been both a driver and pedestrian in the suburbs and in a big city. Driving in a densely populated city trains you to think there’s a pedestrian waiting to pop out of every nook and cranny and hop in front of your car. You might even witness one crawling out of a sewer hole to stand in the middle of the street, and it wouldn’t be too much of a surprise when it happens.