Re:Sam Altman and Andrew Yang talk UBI
by notahacker on Wednesday January 01, 2020 @12:28PM
(#21929113)
Yup. Plus talking about 'VAT on yachts' is nonsensical in the context of funding a basic income anyway. There are a lot of economically inactive people to fund and not many yachts being purchased; wealthy dynasties tend to consume only tiny fractions of the economic rents they can extract from the economy each year. Choosing a consumption tax as a means of funding a UBI ensures that the bulk of the net contribution towards funding it will be paid by the large numbers of people who spend most of their incomes on consumption - i.e the middle classes.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I was only trying to illustrate that a VAT isn't inherently regressive, that example wasn't meant to be taken that seriously.
Re:Sam Altman and Andrew Yang talk UBI
by crdoconnor on Thursday January 02, 2020 @11:26AM
(#21936720)
You inadvertently did the exact opposite.