News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Anti Homeless Spikes by anonymoushn on Sunday December 29, 2019 @11:06PM (#21910732)
one of the many reasons local governments don't approve housing is that tax revenues from housing rapidly decay to 0 while services for the additional residents cost significantly more than 0
Re:Anti Homeless Spikes by joeblow9999 on Monday December 30, 2019 @05:35PM (#21917301)
do you have any references for this? how does the tax revenue 'decay' to 0. Prop 13 doesn't reduce the tax over time but fixes it at a certain amount upon purchase (if the property is new) or transfer if it's sold.

All new houses and transferred properties are taxed at the value they were purchased.

Re:Anti Homeless Spikes by anonymoushn on Tuesday December 31, 2019 @05:18AM (#21920056)
No, I have no citations for the claim that inflation is sometimes above 2% or for the claim that the inflation rate for government services (which includes the cost of buying local housing for government employees) is sometimes above 2%. If either of these were true, the tax collected on a given property would increase in nominal terms but decay toward 0 in real terms.

Unrelatedly, Brisbane found that they could raise 9 times as much revenue and provide 0 times as much additional services to residents by approving hotels instead of housing. https://brianlui.dog/2018/08/01/housing-shortages/#_edn4