Re:Slack have blocked using the website on mobile
by ljm on Saturday December 28, 2019 @06:26PM
(#21902556)
We didn't need an all-in-one hub for realtime chat. Hipchat worked great for us, we had a separate WhatsApp group (with the founders and everyone else in there) for the social stuff. We all mingled but if you didn't want to, they'd find the preferred way to talk to you.
I don't want to name the exact place this happened but it was certainly a unique culture that I now miss. It was neither British or American.
It was the only place I've worked where I had easy and direct access to the founders, the C level, and the VPs, as a lowly senior engineer. And not because I brown-nosed my way up; we'd connect outside of work because we liked the same things.
A total tangent, but it's just to say that we never needed Slack in the first place. I doubt many places do.
Re:Slack have blocked using the website on mobile
by jsjohnst on Saturday December 28, 2019 @10:31PM
(#21903767)
> Search was terrible, integrations/automation were clunky, and it was difficult to post code into chat
Ok, so Slack solved #2 I feel and formerly solved #3 (but has regressed significantly in recent months). Not sure gaining #2 was worth the new negatives we got.
Re:Slack have blocked using the website on mobile
by dreamcompiler on Sunday December 29, 2019 @11:24AM
(#21906673)
Wait, search on Hipchat was worse than Slack's? I never used Hipchat but worse search than Slack is a high bar.
Also, I think Slack's threads are useful. You can have channels where you just post a single message for your question/issue and then have people reply in a thread, so that messages are naturally grouped together by topic instead of being a firehose of interleaved messages. Combined with good search, this makes Slack more of a valuable knowledge store than just an ephemeral chat tool.