News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:California bans per-minute billing; Tesla Superchargers w... by clouddrover on Wednesday December 25, 2019 @04:18PM (#21880529)
The idea is to ensure that users are informed about the amount of electricity they're paying for. The number of kilowatt hours drawn from the charger is not the same as the number of kilowatt hours that end up in the battery.

Here's a demonstration on an Ionity charger with a Tesla Model 3:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPrVZtzAqX4

In the end the charger delivered 65.5 kWh but only 61 kWh was added to the battery. 4.5 kWh is a difference worth knowing about.

Re:California bans per-minute billing; Tesla Superchargers w... by perl4ever on Wednesday December 25, 2019 @04:22PM (#21880560)
Being billed for kWh at all and not time seems like a far more important part of regulation.
Re:California bans per-minute billing; Tesla Superchargers w... by clouddrover on Wednesday December 25, 2019 @04:36PM (#21880615)
All the parts are important. It's regulation that has to be followed.