Re:Downsides to working at a tech giant
by account73466 on Monday December 23, 2019 @03:32PM
(#21867094)
I can imagine this to be true but do you have a source for that information?
Re:Downsides to working at a tech giant
by scarface74 on Monday December 23, 2019 @03:56PM
(#21867295)
Re:Downsides to working at a tech giant
by account73466 on Monday December 23, 2019 @04:52PM
(#21867767)
Thanks for the links! I am aware of the Buffet's bets but I did have a feeling that some VCs can be quite profitable especially the ones which invest in future government contractors and/or future surveillance facilitators.
Re:Downsides to working at a tech giant
by scarface74 on Monday December 23, 2019 @04:55PM
(#21867794)
The VCs are always profitable - for themselves. They get 20% returns no matter what. Their investors on the hand....
Re:Downsides to working at a tech giant
by keithwhor on Monday December 23, 2019 @02:49PM
(#21866673)
You’re making this (single startup) v. (single S&P company). That’s not how it works. Prove yourself at being an adept generalist and you’ll, over time, create access to the most ambitious people and companies.
Re:Downsides to working at a tech giant
by scarface74 on Monday December 23, 2019 @02:51PM
(#21866695)
I’m doing just the opposite. I’m comparing VC funds in the aggregate to stocks in the aggregate using VC funds returns as a proxy for startup returns.
I think that’s fair. By definition you can’t invest in bootstrapped “lifestyle companies” and they rarely have “outsized returns”.
There are a lot of “ambitious people” who have failed that you never hear about.
This is statistically not true. S&P 500 Index funds have outperformed VC's as a group for any reasonable time period.