Efficient cache for gigabytes of data written in Go

Re:Efficient cache for gigabytes of data written in Go by rat9988 on Monday December 23, 2019 @02:54PM (#21866719)

If it's the only think you criticize about him, then I guess he is worth of support. There is nothing wrong with this terminology unless you can prove otherwise.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Efficient cache for gigabytes of data written in Go by KirinDave on Monday December 23, 2019 @03:09PM (#21866871)

Weird, I didn't mention it on the first post. I had 6 specific criticisms, 5 of which were technical.

If anything, this is an example of how the Redis community has actors that pop up trying to distract from direct criticism.

I'm being downvoted and flagged despite my post being substantive, on topic, and in direct response to a question. There are valid reasons not to use Redis.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Efficient cache for gigabytes of data written in Go by rat9988 on Monday December 23, 2019 @07:40PM (#21868904)

I'm not dismissing the other points, I'm just discussing this one. I don't even use redis.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Efficient cache for gigabytes of data written in Go by KirinDave on Monday December 23, 2019 @09:11PM (#21869290)

> If it's the only think you criticize about him

Sorry, but this kind of wording implying I have 1 complaint when I've clearly stated others gave me the wrong idea.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Efficient cache for gigabytes of data written in Go by rat9988 on Tuesday December 24, 2019 @06:00PM (#21875517)

Are there any other points about redis creator you raised?

[ Parent | on HN ]