News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lilith: x86-64 OS written in Crystal by extempore on Monday December 23, 2019 @02:09AM (#21861981)
That seems decidedly unsafe to say, but even if you’re right, the second paragraph doesn’t follow from the first. “Everyone generalizes from one example! At least, I do.”
Re:Lilith: x86-64 OS written in Crystal by kick on Monday December 23, 2019 @02:39AM (#21862072)
It's been shown repeatedly. Arthur Whitney is another example. In fact, basically every major technological innovation of the past two centuries has been because of people doing this.

The first was just to share an example. The second paragraph is common knowledge.

Re:Lilith: x86-64 OS written in Crystal by Symmetry on Monday December 23, 2019 @08:15AM (#21863381)
We do depend in a profound way on people trying the impossible for our civilization to progress. But at the same time most attempts to do the impossible do end in failure and I think it would be mistake to say that people trying do the impossible do better on average than those who don't. Rather, we should encourage play, tilting at windmills, etc knowing full well that we're accepting the danger of failure now but making an investment in the future.