News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fast by jacobush on Saturday December 21, 2019 @06:06AM (#21850750)
It IS a big problem, but shifting stuff around in a dense city is different from piling some dirt into a shape on the tundra.
Re:Fast by Turing_Machine on Saturday December 21, 2019 @10:26AM (#21851578)
Most of the route is through extremely rugged mountainous terrain, not tundra, and developing a roadbed that can survive -70 F winters is a lot more involved than "piling dirt into a shape"

I traveled it before was paved, and it was, and is, a true engineering marvel.

Re:Fast by jacobush on Monday December 23, 2019 @08:23AM (#21863423)
Yes, I both unravelled my vast illiteracy on road engineering in general and understated a bit on purpose. My point was that there is not much existing infrastructure to take into account up there. Your point taken though.
Re:Fast by clarry on Saturday December 21, 2019 @06:19AM (#21850786)
And yet the infrastructure cost of rural areas is regularly cited as a problem, and moving people into big dense cities is proposed as the solution.
Re:Fast by jonfw on Saturday December 21, 2019 @08:35AM (#21851133)
One meter of road in the middle of san francisco would be used more than a meter of road in rural areas.

While the costs are higher- so are the benefits

Re:Fast by jmpman on Saturday December 21, 2019 @09:53AM (#21851410)
The benefits per dollar or per meter? How many passengers are traveling on a bus on Van Ness in a given rush hour?