Re:Show HN: FortyQ – Answering any question in forty-two min...
by fixf on Friday December 20, 2019 @08:06PM
(#21848842)
Against the use of double binds. To me they are an indicator of hostile intent, although as demonstrated here and in the practice of law, adversarial interactions can be constructive. This abstraction is incredibly beautiful, but typical examples are not necessarily nice.
Re:Show HN: FortyQ – Answering any question in forty-two min...
by judlaw on Saturday December 21, 2019 @07:08AM
(#21850902)
Do double binds automatically come in though, when you allow people of disparate backgrounds and experiences a platform to express opinion?
Could be constructive though as far as law is concerned.
What typical examples would you refer to?
Re:Show HN: FortyQ – Answering any question in forty-two min...
by fixf on Saturday December 21, 2019 @07:55AM
(#21851024)
They could, though I think much of that can be mitigated with effort. I believe the textbook example is domestic abuse, but I worry that the scope also coincides with fallout from poisoned well attacks and tribalistic recruitment efforts.
One thing that I have noticed working legal questions in the past weeks is that people more lost than they were when given all possible viewpoints and given the possibility to choose. More often than not they are looking for someone to tell them what to do. Makes sense though if you think about it.
Not sure I entirely got the 'Education against them.. ' point, could you elaborate?