Re:About Bokeh
by geerlingguy on Friday December 20, 2019 @04:02PM
(#21847359)
If you have solid edges (e.g. hair pulled back or bald), and a fairly smooth background already... it looks acceptable.
But it's not a substitute for a really nice lens and sensor combo. Maybe someday.
I just wish the DSLR/mirrorless manufactuers would invest more in making their RAW files more intelligent. I don't want 'portrait mode' but I do want to be able to focus stack in one image (with originals preserved), do true adjustable HDR (combining exposures), etc.
Sony and Nikon have a couple hint at these capabilities, but the software is not easy to use, and don't get me started on moving pictures between camera bodies and wherever they need to be to do things with them (laptop, iPad, phone).
These improvements to bokeh on the Pixel 4 and Pixel 4 XL show some pretty good results: https://ai.googleblog.com/2019/12/improvements-to-portrait-m...
Re:About Bokeh
by unicornporn on Friday December 20, 2019 @04:46PM
(#21847642)
Impossible to say because sample[1] is highly compressed and 800 pixels high (including a white border).
[1] https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-3Sm2XHss0lA/XffZ95s_KjI/AAAAAAAAF...
Re:About Bokeh
by erkserkserks on Friday December 20, 2019 @08:39PM
(#21848991)
Here’s the full size album: https://photos.app.goo.gl/cwaKemRDusTK5W6SA
Re:About Bokeh
by unicornporn on Saturday December 21, 2019 @06:50AM
(#21850864)
Still not full-res and unfortunately the first two samples[1] I opened shows that it's still crap and can't handle fine detail/hair. Many people have hair.
Portrait mode on any phone looks crap. I have not yet seen a picture where fake shallow DOF does not fail and look crap.