Re:Boeing Starliner updates: Spacecraft flies into wrong orb...
by TheOtherHobbes on Friday December 20, 2019 @11:47AM
(#21845440)
A man-rated launch vehicle failing to reach orbit seems like very good reason.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Boeing Starliner updates: Spacecraft flies into wrong orb...
by AWildC182 on Friday December 20, 2019 @12:09PM
(#21845615)
The complexity of adding a remote man it the loop creates way more room for error than running a timer. They just fucked up plain and simple.
This is like saying that because the airplane crashed because the wing was incorrectly designed and popped off, everyone should fly biplanes...
Re:Boeing Starliner updates: Spacecraft flies into wrong orb...
by dotancohen on Friday December 20, 2019 @03:31PM
(#21847144)
> This is like saying that because the airplane crashed because the wing
> was incorrectly designed and popped off, everyone should fly biplanes...
We do that. Not with the wings, but with the engines. When jetliner engines were less reliable, we required 3 or more engines on flights that included long sections without passing near an airport (mostly transoceanic flights). Now that some engines are more reliable, we have ETOPS certifications for jetliners using two high-reliablility engines. And yes, there still are two, because no matter how reliable the engines may be, one _may_ fail.
What is backing up that CST-100 timer?
Re:Boeing Starliner updates: Spacecraft flies into wrong orb...
by Jkosmonaut on Friday December 20, 2019 @02:00PM
(#21846551)
The man-related launch vehicle worked flawlessly. This was a capsule failure. They’re built by different entities.