There is a point in there I think you're missing. That is Google is an advertising company. Isn't it hypocritical to have an issue with Cliqz for being an advertising company while being OK with Chrome which is from an advertising company (Google)?

If posts from Google and Chrome are OK for hacker news then why not from others with similar business models?

I'm not attempting to say that Cliqz has an OK model. I'm suggesting self examination and consistency.