Re:Amazon, Apple, Google, and the Zigbee Alliance to develop...
by mr__y on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @01:26PM
(#21827687)
>drive-by type attacks would be very concerning
not only that. One insecure system in the area could be infected and then controlled to attack other networks in the area. With a high density of IoT devices you could have malware spreading wirelessly device-to-device.
Also with a wide IoT adoption with such devices being used by public/utilities companies (smart street lamps, leakage monitoring in pipes, smart electric grid etc) you don't even need a densely populated area to have that problem.
>I am more concerned about the bigger threat, global attacks.
I once read something among the lines that IT security needs its own Pearl Harbor event. I can neither quote it exactly or attribute it to any source
not only that. One insecure system in the area could be infected and then controlled to attack other networks in the area. With a high density of IoT devices you could have malware spreading wirelessly device-to-device. Also with a wide IoT adoption with such devices being used by public/utilities companies (smart street lamps, leakage monitoring in pipes, smart electric grid etc) you don't even need a densely populated area to have that problem.
>I am more concerned about the bigger threat, global attacks.
I once read something among the lines that IT security needs its own Pearl Harbor event. I can neither quote it exactly or attribute it to any source