Re:Google Brass Set 2023 as Deadline to Beat Amazon, Microso...
by zelly on Tuesday December 17, 2019 @01:02PM
(#21816458)
The person you have to hire to manage that would cost 10x a public cloud bill
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google Brass Set 2023 as Deadline to Beat Amazon, Microso...
by Youden on Tuesday December 17, 2019 @02:49PM
(#21817907)
There are options other than "put your entire infrastructure on Amazon" and "hire someone fulltime to manage your physical infrastructure".
Unless you have some truly massive amount of hardware (in which case it's _definitely_ cheaper to hire someone than pay Amazon), you can generally just set it up and forget about it save for periodic maintenance and emergencies.
So what you really need to pay for is the time of someone who can do these things for you and funnily enough, such a service exists. I believe it's common in the not-startup world: a managed services provider (MSP).
And in the end this really depends on what the business is actually doing. AWS is _really_ price inefficient but in particular for bandwidth. If you're doing anything bandwidth-heavy like video, images or backup, you want to keep the hell away from any kind of cloud.
Re:Google Brass Set 2023 as Deadline to Beat Amazon, Microso...
by jethro_tell on Tuesday December 17, 2019 @01:05PM
(#21816489)
It's a classic pre-mature optimization. Source: Guy who manages 'private cloud'