I do appreciate art and ambiguity in literature or many culture endeavor. I'd have no qualm in Debord if he was saying he wrote a literary experiment.

However, it claims to be philosophy, not an art performance. I am of the position that while you can (and should!) imbue philosophy into your art, you should not present ambiguous and undecipherable art as a piece of philosophy.

I can make a sculpture that use integral calculus in the way it forms shape, but that would not be an appropriate way to present a theorem at a mathematics conference.