Re:Engineer says Google fired her for notifying co-workers o...
by zozbot234 on Tuesday December 17, 2019 @10:05AM
(#21814096)
It's not a "political" statement, it's a notice of Googlers' existing obligations under labor law and pursuant to a NLRB settlement. She was indeed correct to warn any Googlers who might interact with the external consulting firm about those obligations.
Re:Engineer says Google fired her for notifying co-workers o...
by PhasmaFelis on Tuesday December 17, 2019 @09:55AM
(#21813999)
It's an odd world we live in where factual information about legal rights is dismissed as a "political statement".
As others have said, if she'd abused her access to insert, say, a pithy pop-up about recycling on Earth Day, she would have received a slap on the wrist at the very worst. This isn't about changing the code without authorization. This is about a message Google doesn't want employees to hear.
EDIT: Let's read the second paragraph of the article again:
"each time Google employees visited the website of IRI Consultants — the Troy, Michigan, firm that Google hired this year amid a groundswell of labor activism at the company"
You see that phrase 'labor activism'? This is the exact cognitive dissonance I am describing here. You want to pretend activism isn't political, that an employee planting a message on the website of a company affiliated with their employer related to this political subject is totally innocent and not a politically charged message. Just 'totally telling you your rights' and nothing more than that. That's intellectually dishonest.