Re:Modern garbage collection: Part 2
by throwaway34241 on Monday December 16, 2019 @02:03PM
(#21805972)
> Or maybe just like Azul's numbers from 2005?
In the very sentence you quoted I said “excluding exotic commercial ones like Azul“. I’m not sure what point you are trying to make here.
> Shenandoah 2.0 does not
I see. I only googled that link to find the latency target (since it wasn’t mentioned in the original article), I have to confess I didn’t read the rest of it and almost all of what I wrote is based on the original article. Good to know that some of that information is now out of date.
In the very sentence you quoted I said “excluding exotic commercial ones like Azul“. I’m not sure what point you are trying to make here.
> Shenandoah 2.0 does not
I see. I only googled that link to find the latency target (since it wasn’t mentioned in the original article), I have to confess I didn’t read the rest of it and almost all of what I wrote is based on the original article. Good to know that some of that information is now out of date.