News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Creating a deepfake took two weeks and cost $552. Parent comment

Re:Creating a deepfake took two weeks and cost $552 by Der_Einzige on Monday December 16, 2019 @11:47AM (#21804426)
Autoencoders aren't even the best dimensionality reduction technique. Where are UMAP powered "manifold" fakes?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Creating a deepfake took two weeks and cost $552 by LolWolf on Monday December 16, 2019 @11:56AM (#21804530)
UMAP is, sadly, extraordinarily slow, plus the inverse mapping is not clear.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Creating a deepfake took two weeks and cost $552 by Der_Einzige on Monday December 16, 2019 @12:10PM (#21804674)
There are GPU implementations...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Creating a deepfake took two weeks and cost $552 by LolWolf on Monday December 16, 2019 @01:53PM (#21805842)
Still doesn't fix the inverse mapping problem, which is done immediately by Autoencoders, by definition.
[ Parent | on HN ]