News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Emotion-detecting tech should be restricted by law by carapace on Sunday December 15, 2019 @07:51PM (#21800046)
> ...which is exactly what I'd expect from AI Now.

I don't know anything about them before today.

Did you see https://www.cs.princeton.edu/~arvindn/talks/MIT-STS-AI-snake... which they link to in their report? It seems pretty solid to me.

> Everyday experience shows that we can read people's feelings via their faces.

Yeah, humans can, sometimes, but that doesn't mean these systems can.

> Astrology doesn't work either and we don't have to go around banning that.

First off, astrology does work, depending on the astrologer.

Second, yes, if people were selling astrology to HR departments to screen candidates I think we should ban that.

Re:Emotion-detecting tech should be restricted by law by quotemstr on Sunday December 15, 2019 @08:14PM (#21800147)
> astrology does work

Is anyone supposed to take seriously anything else you say now that you've claimed that astrology works? You might as well be claiming we can predict the future by looking at bird entrails.

Re:Emotion-detecting tech should be restricted by law by carapace on Sunday December 15, 2019 @08:24PM (#21800174)
> Is anyone supposed to take seriously anything ... you say ...

That's really entirely up to each person, and none of my business really.

I will say that, although I make mistakes, I never lie, and rarely exaggerate. I don't participate in HN to talk nonsense.

Now then, yes, some people can predict the future by divination of entrails. Thankfully this particular mode has become quite rare.

All forms of divination work, BTW, and have the same underlying motive.

- - - -

Anyway, did you look at that PDF? If so, what did you think?