>> If it could be shown that there's low success in the software, yet it's relied on despite racial bias, then I would think few rational people could argue for its removal.

> I don't follow. If the software has been unsuccessful, that seems like a good reason to remove it. If, additionally, it has been making decisions on racial grounds, that seems like another good reason to remove it.

I mistyped there. I meant to say "few rational people could argue AGAINST its removal".

I had originally edited my sentence partially and mangled the meaning entirely.