The U.S. Government at the very top is infested now with habitual grifters and liars. Young people look at them, and go - it works for them, they are all rich.
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/10/christianne-allen-g...
"Rudy's new 20 year-old spokeswoman hasn't finished college, pretended to be related to George Allen, and has given herself many titles that are not accurate. “Nobody can figure out who the eff she is or how she got in there,” a friend of Giuliani told me."
She is twenty.
When was this not the case?
''FDR was a gifted and facile liar,''
https://www.nytimes.com/1985/10/13/books/manipulative-secret...
I would expect much of the same from a glance at any politician. Politics is a field that rewards deception.
The perverse incentives of democracy have been illustrated from Plato through to Hans Hermann Hoppe.
The new way is obvious, shameless, blatant, and unapologetic. "We run this bitch, what are YOU going to do about it". No?
I grew up in Ukraine in the most corrupt post-Soviet era. Even then corruption was done with finesse. A lush mansion is hidden from the view, and you really need to go looking for it.
Not the Steve Mnuchin level of "we are going to take a private jet to Fort Knox, watch the Solar eclipse on top of a pile of gold, and put it on Instagram" kind.
From my view it is more of a wink into the camera. A whiff of self-irony and an acknowledgement of the farce. Shamelessly reveling in the spectacle while calling out the closeted prudes as hypocrites. Parodying stilted, cliched performances.
All of us are more aware of what comes up when someone googles us, that we will be judged based on what's out there.
Or perhaps it's just the money. One does not have to be a good citizen if you are loaded. Social contracts and norms are for losers. And, since Trump assembled the richest cabinet in U.S. history, it only makes sense.
I don't think anyone wants that, but this has been the case since the invention of the printing press and probably longer. It also gets really tricky when what is a lie vs. what is truth is not obvious.
The group of people that is pushing the "fake news" line definitely wants that. It is absolutely dependent upon lying to maintain power.
Someone is presumably making a handsome living by lying for the rich, so at least one person wants this. And there are people paying for this service, so clearly there are people who want to live in this kind of world.
It doesn't matter that this problem has existed forever. So has murder. Are you arguing that we shouldn't care about people murdering each other because it's a timeless problem? I assume no.
It's not tricky at all when someone knowingly, intentionally pushes fake content at scale to sway public opinion. That's an unconscionable act with very clear and dark intentions. That shouldn't be "tricky" to assess, because we know very clearly that what they are doing is absolutely, unequivocally, wrong.
Much of Europe still have criminal defamation laws on the books, for example.
This has never been, and will never be true. Free speech has always had legal limitations. It’s illegal to defame someone, for example.
Who really wants to live in a world where it’s so much easier and effective to lie than to tell the truth? Where the burden of seeking the truth becomes finding a needle in a haystack, do you want to live in that world?
History has shown us when societies fail to recognize the truth, and it has only ever brought death and destruction.
If the freedom to spread lies far and wide without repercussions overpowers our society’s ability to function, we’re in for some deep trouble.