News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:If this project is dead, just tell us by noname120 on Friday December 13, 2019 @11:05AM (#21782750)
True. This same tutorial cites pip-tools, hatch, poetry. Does that mean that they “endorse” these tools as well?
Re:If this project is dead, just tell us by shakna on Friday December 13, 2019 @11:54AM (#21783212)
However, over here [0] I see pipenv, but not those:

> Use Pipenv to manage library dependencies when developing Python applications. See Managing Application Dependencies for more details on using pipenv.

> Consider other tools such as pip when pipenv does not meet your use case.

That recommendation is absolutely unambiguous.

[0] https://packaging.python.org/guides/tool-recommendations/

Re:If this project is dead, just tell us by noname120 on Friday December 13, 2019 @12:03PM (#21783286)
Right, I stand corrected.
Re:If this project is dead, just tell us by domoritz on Friday December 13, 2019 @12:34PM (#21783546)
So if it isn't supposed to be officially endorsed, should someone file an issue at https://github.com/pypa/packaging.python.org/issues?
Re:If this project is dead, just tell us by shakna on Friday December 13, 2019 @12:42PM (#21783631)
It hasn't been removed, because PyPA disagree [0].

> It's an official project of PyPA still, it's just not being pushed as the "be-all-end-all" option.

[0] https://github.com/pypa/packaging.python.org/issues/589

Re:If this project is dead, just tell us by doublement on Friday December 13, 2019 @12:01PM (#21783278)
> This same tutorial cites pip-tools, hatch, poetry. Does that mean that they “endorse” these tools as well?

Those tools are relegated to a small section at the end, whereas the main body of the text says "Pipenv is recommended for collaborative projects..."

I'd say that counts as a specific endorsement of Pipenv. I guess it's an endorsement by the "Python Packaging Authority" rather than "Python Core" but it's pretty hard for someone at the tutorial-reading level to perceive the difference.