News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The More Gender Equality, the Fewer Women in STEM (2018) by TulliusCicero on Thursday December 12, 2019 @06:56PM (#21777838)
How exactly would you measure social 'punishment' in response to negotiating in the real world? Contact random women's bosses right after they attempt to negotiate and ask them how they felt about it? You could set up interviews with real companies using your own candidates who will negotiate or not negotiate as you direct them, but then how do you gather data on the feelings of the bosses?

Some things can only really be tested in artificial environments.

Re:The More Gender Equality, the Fewer Women in STEM (2018) by dahauns on Saturday December 14, 2019 @12:08PM (#21790511)
>Some things can only really be tested in artificial environments.

What exactly do you think will be tested in that artificial environment when the environment itself (with what I'd hazard to guess quite a list of specifics, many of the "subtle and implicit, but influential" kind) is a central variable of the test?

If an observational study of this kind is deemed hard/improbable/impossible to set up - how hard do you think it is to get the artificial setup right? To account for - or even identify - all variables and preconditions? This is so easy to mess up and end up with basically meaningless data. (Yeah, I know - that doesn't mean it won't be published. Everybody raise your hands and shout "Replication Crisis"! :) )