Re:Intel’s Manufacturing Roadmap from 2019 to 2029
by Red_Leaves_Flyy on Thursday December 12, 2019 @08:20AM
(#21771576)
You can probably rewrite the codebase to utilize n threads before anyone releases an 8, 12, 36ghz CPU.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Intel’s Manufacturing Roadmap from 2019 to 2029
by madengr on Thursday December 12, 2019 @08:36AM
(#21771680)
It’s electromagnetic simulation, specifically finite element. You can parallelize some of the math, but mostly not. You can break the structure into smaller sub-domains, but that has issues too. Not much gain beyond 2-4 cores.
Re:Intel’s Manufacturing Roadmap from 2019 to 2029
by david-gpu on Thursday December 12, 2019 @09:00AM
(#21771880)
Not my area of expertise, but I was under the impression that finite element analysis, like other sparse algebra problems, are reasonably well suited for GPUs, which are much more parallel than 2 or 3 cores. Have you looked into that?
Re:Intel’s Manufacturing Roadmap from 2019 to 2029
by madengr on Thursday December 12, 2019 @12:27PM
(#21773969)
The time domain codes work well with GPUs and multiple cores, but the frequency domain ones don’t. I don’t know enough of what’s going on under the hood, but it’s like that for all of them.
Re:Intel’s Manufacturing Roadmap from 2019 to 2029
by wbl on Thursday December 12, 2019 @10:54AM
(#21772858)
I've worked with applied math PDE people and they use supercomputers to full effect. Granted it's a real pain and your cross connect bandwidth matters (hence supercomputer), but you can scale up pretty well.