But I could think of many ways existing ML could help producers and composers while they're working. They can present possibilities and alternatives that the composer can choose from; they can find interesting combinations and permutations and patterns; they can potentially learn from your workflow and save you time in the future, etc.
I kind of have some ideas of how to develop applications like these. Maybe I should pursue them; although I currently work in a totally unrelated field.
In my case, I built my own, through 10 years of organic instrumental input for the system to chomp through.
That's how you apply machine learning to the discipline of music.
It's also apparently wrong: https://magenta.tensorflow.org/datasets
Thanks for your contribution.
You say that I am applying a false premise and that I am apparently wrong -- but what kind of nonsense have those datasets output that comes even close to what I [0] have?
Also, you strongly misunderstand the value of having to build your own dataset of actual human input to achieve anything good in AI-assisted music-making. Good musical AI does not simply seek to mimic a dataset. That's such a pedantic oversimplification of this noble, difficult task that those of us who actually care about this issue face.
This problem cannot be solved like an object detection problem. You have a lot to learn before you start trying to insult those of us who have devoted much of our lives to the "problem" of AI in music.
This is art, buddy. Stay away from it if you are going to treat it like a mindless AI researcher at some institution.
I think they may soon revolutionize workflows for electronic music producers. This is an amazing first step in that direction.