Check out this antiquated walrus over here, talking about Blockchain convolutional neural networks like it’s November 2019.

Here in the present we’re doing our neural networks with non-quantum simulated quantum networks that definitely don’t not not work.

I don’t suspect this is true, as VCs would quickly go bankrupt investing enormous amounts of money into such a startup

VC returns are not what you think they are. There is a lot of dumb money floating around and the long term returns of quite a few funds are much lower than what you might think. A couple of funds outperform the remainder quite handily which results in an average that looks acceptable but quite a few people lost a lot of $ on becoming an LP of a badly managed fund.

That won't stop the fund managers from making out like bandits, the carry may be nil but the management fees will more than make up for that. Beware of investing in funds where the fund managers do not have substantial skin in the game.

> There is a lot of dumb money floating around

I like to refer to funding and acquisitions in terms of Juiceros, equivalent to $120M. Instagram was purchased for about 8.3 Juiceros.

I do the same, but I measure in terms of Instagrams. I might take your idea for sub-Instagram units, though measuring by units of $120 million adds more overhead than units of $1 billion.

Hehe, that's funny. I may adopt that, but at the level that I'm investing I'll have to use uJuiceros or there will be way too many zeros.

Surely such a thing would exist not on Earth, but in the Cloud.