News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Redis and SQLite: Why wait for good enough?.

Re:Redis and SQLite: Why wait for good enough? by ericflo on Thursday February 03, 2011 @04:07AM (#2174176)
Wait what? Is the author suggesting that antirez stop his efforts on Redis and switch to working on MySQL stored routines? It says, "It’s just proof that antirez has options about where to spend his time." And then it switches gears to talking about SQLite. And then about BDB and Membase and Innostore and Bitcask and Riak and Solr and his MIT class number.

I'm sure this author has a point he's trying to make, but I can't seem to make out what it is.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Redis and SQLite: Why wait for good enough? by siculars on Thursday February 03, 2011 @04:14AM (#2174185)
I think the point the author is trying to make is that antirez should not be wasting his time re-inventing the persistence wheel. As in, there are already many persistence plays available that are proven to work within known bounds.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Redis and SQLite: Why wait for good enough? by velly on Thursday February 03, 2011 @12:08PM (#2175499)
Bingo! (from the author). I wrote this late at night at the end of a long day, but that's the point.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Redis and SQLite: Why wait for good enough? by ryanpetrich on Thursday February 03, 2011 @12:35PM (#2175644)
The horse and buggy was proven to work within known bounds.
[ Parent | on HN ]