Re:W3C recommends WebAssembly
by ChicagoDave on Friday December 06, 2019 @03:14PM
(#21725539)
A couple of takeaways:
I’d love to see a XAML implementation for wasm, because it’s cleaner than html/css.
Looking forward to .NET Core running in warm.
I could see hackability actually improving since data and API access could be well-defined.
I could see Publishers adopting wasm so their websites are more under their control.
But most of all, software development getting out of the scripting business, which has such a wide range of misuse that it becomes expensive and unwieldy to maintain.
I’d love to see a XAML implementation for wasm, because it’s cleaner than html/css.
Looking forward to .NET Core running in warm.
I could see hackability actually improving since data and API access could be well-defined.
I could see Publishers adopting wasm so their websites are more under their control.
But most of all, software development getting out of the scripting business, which has such a wide range of misuse that it becomes expensive and unwieldy to maintain.