News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:W3C recommends WebAssembly by als0 on Friday December 06, 2019 @03:11PM (#21725510)
> Modern JavaScript addressed these issues, hence its popularity over Flash

I think that while this is technically true, technical adequacy didn't lure developers away from Flash player. I believe that the real turning point was when Apple decided to break Adobe's monopoly on the web by disallowing Flash player on all their products.

Re:W3C recommends WebAssembly by throwaway894345 on Friday December 06, 2019 @03:57PM (#21725912)
I agree that that was a turning point for usage, but we're discussing popularity among developers. Flash was unpopular among developers long before Apple banned it.
Re:W3C recommends WebAssembly by als0 on Friday December 06, 2019 @04:06PM (#21725982)
Flash was on approximately 30% of websites before. It's hard to understand the argument that it was unpopular amongst devs.
Re:W3C recommends WebAssembly by throwaway894345 on Friday December 06, 2019 @04:11PM (#21726022)
Devs hated Flash for all of the reasons cited above, but browsers didn't support anything better for many use cases.
Re:W3C recommends WebAssembly by ppseafield on Friday December 06, 2019 @04:32PM (#21726185)
Indeed. As an example for a long time you had to have Flash to play a video on your page. The HTML5 video support eventually ended the need for Flash to do this, but it came much later and very slowly became supported cross-browser.
Re:W3C recommends WebAssembly by jayflux on Friday December 06, 2019 @08:44PM (#21727886)
Although that event was a nail in the coffin, developers were moving away from flash long before Apple banned it.