Re:Why Taxpayers Pay McKinsey $3M a Year for a Recent Colleg...
by salamander014 on Thursday December 05, 2019 @02:03PM
(#21715233)
Companies trust capital expenses more than operational expenses for some strange reason. I don't know why.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why Taxpayers Pay McKinsey $3M a Year for a Recent Colleg...
by bumby on Thursday December 05, 2019 @03:50PM
(#21716329)
Cost Bias: A fallacy of ethos (that of a product), the fact that something expensive (either in terms of money, or something that is "hard fought" or "hard won" or for which one "paid dearly") is generally valued more highly than something obtained free or cheaply, regardless of the item's real quality, utility or true value to the purchaser.[1]
[1] http://utminers.utep.edu/omwilliamson/ENGL1311/fallacies.htm
Re:Why Taxpayers Pay McKinsey $3M a Year for a Recent Colleg...
by organsnyder on Thursday December 05, 2019 @02:12PM
(#21715349)
I think it's psychological. With capital expenses, the decision to spend a lot of money tends to be a discrete event/process, while operations usually grow slowly over time. We place inherent value in big purchases—after all, I decided to make the purchase, so it must be valuable.