Re:Stress That Doesn't Pay: The Commuting Paradox (2004) [pdf]
by 99052882514569 on Thursday December 05, 2019 @12:37PM
(#21714300)
The problem with that logic is opportunity cost. What improvements to public transit could have been done with that thick wad of cash? Often (usually?) ones that would open up options and mobility to far more people.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Stress That Doesn't Pay: The Commuting Paradox (2004) [pdf]
by bluGill on Thursday December 05, 2019 @12:49PM
(#21714410)
Actually not. The highway allows undense spread out development. While you can build transit to those areas, to have useful transit (meaning stop every 5 minutes, not too many detours, and few transfers) you end up spending far more capital to build lightly used lines that are expensive to operator because so few people are on them (even if we assume private cars are illegal there wouldn't be many riders).
Note that not dense is the important part of the above. If you are willing to allow dense development (which most zones in the US prohibit) everything changes.
Re:Stress That Doesn't Pay: The Commuting Paradox (2004) [pdf]
by magduf on Friday December 06, 2019 @11:25AM
(#21723228)
>If you are willing to allow dense development (which most zones in the US prohibit) everything changes.
Yep, this is the answer to it all: we need to build much more densely, and people need to get used to not having a big McMansion with a gigantic lawn.