News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Case for Portland-to-Vancouver High-Speed Rail by minikites on Thursday December 05, 2019 @08:21AM (#21712027)
>That your country cannot do large infrastructure projects anymore. The US mamaged to build the interstates in the past

The political right has convinced a large portion of the US population that _any_ government spending is wasteful and unnecessary. Those people don't see government spending as an investment, they see it as theft.

Re:The Case for Portland-to-Vancouver High-Speed Rail by swebs on Thursday December 05, 2019 @08:38AM (#21712138)
That's a pretty ridiculous strawmen argument.
Re:The Case for Portland-to-Vancouver High-Speed Rail by minikites on Thursday December 05, 2019 @08:42AM (#21712168)
>Anti-tax activist Grover Norquist famously declared, "I don't want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub."
Re:The Case for Portland-to-Vancouver High-Speed Rail by swebs on Thursday December 05, 2019 @09:01AM (#21712298)
And his name is often invoked because he's such a fringe extremist. I doubt even 5% of Americans would agree with him, much less the ~40% who identify as right-leaning as you seem to imply.
Re:The Case for Portland-to-Vancouver High-Speed Rail by larkost on Thursday December 05, 2019 @06:36PM (#21717862)
It does not really matter whether those ~40% would agree. It only matter what portion of those would vote for someone who does. As a floor for that number I would submit that the Freedom Caucus has 32 of the 198 Republican seats in the house (~16% or Republican seats). Those Representatives have pretty much declared that they agree with him. So some percentage above that.
Re:The Case for Portland-to-Vancouver High-Speed Rail by organsnyder on Thursday December 05, 2019 @04:37PM (#21716848)
He holds a massive amount of sway within the Republican party.