News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is virtue signalling a perversion of morality? by romaniitedomum on Wednesday December 04, 2019 @11:04PM (#21709882)
> I wasn't raised Catholic, but the way I heard it, committing a venal sin counting on it being negligible because it was venal is, itself, a mortal sin -- which tickled me at the time.

No, a sin is either venal or mortal. The intent of the sinner doesn't enter into it.

> Also, that only the sins since your last confession, or communion, or something, count in any way at all.

If you confess a sin and ask forgiveness, it's forgiven. Your slate is wiped clean.

> Or what, exactly, would be meant by a "virginal purity test".

Simply that many in social media demand a level of purity in thought and action from commenters and other writers that rivals in its puritanical zeal the worst excesses of the most ignorant village mullah.

> No. You are tying yourself in knots; which is your privilege. Please don't entangle me in them.

But if virtue signalling is sanctimony, a point which you have not refuted, and complaining about virtue signalling is sanctimony, then complaining about sanctimony is indeed sanctimonious. Any entanglement is of your own making.

There are no comments on this comment yet.