News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Developers join call for GitHub to cancel its ICE contract by LiNeXT on Wednesday December 04, 2019 @12:10PM (#21704093)
This is how enterprise sales are done.
Re:Developers join call for GitHub to cancel its ICE contract by SolaceQuantum on Wednesday December 04, 2019 @12:23PM (#21704323)
If Blizzard can be panned for its enterprise-style move to strip winnings from pro-HK messaging tournament winner in order to better ameliorate itself to a large potential consumer base, why isn’t GitHub allowed to be panned for its enterprise moves in pursuing sales with an organization that is embroiled in political scandal?
Re:Developers join call for GitHub to cancel its ICE contract by LiNeXT on Wednesday December 04, 2019 @12:35PM (#21704507)
There is a vast difference between selling software to your own government for their use and directly, actively, and punitively screwing with an individual a foreign government doesn't like.
Re:Developers join call for GitHub to cancel its ICE contract by SolaceQuantum on Wednesday December 04, 2019 @12:38PM (#21704550)
It was done in order to continue friendly relations with a potential client base. Wasn’t Amazons Ring panned for giving data to the police? Don’t we have a thread on the front page right now about Google giving personal data to the DoJ?
Re:Developers join call for GitHub to cancel its ICE contract by JumpCrisscross on Wednesday December 04, 2019 @12:56PM (#21704798)
> It was done in order to continue friendly relations with a potential client base

The analogous action for GitHub to Blizzard’s would be booting a user ICE doesn't like to maintain friendly ties with the latter. That hasn't happened.

Re:Developers join call for GitHub to cancel its ICE contract by SolaceQuantum on Wednesday December 04, 2019 @12:59PM (#21704840)
Didn’t GitLab do this?
Re:Developers join call for GitHub to cancel its ICE contract by input_sh on Wednesday December 04, 2019 @01:23PM (#21705196)
As far as I know, not quite.

GitLab modified their customer acceptance so that it gives them an option to refuse a client, saying that they will reach such a decision on a case-by-case basis: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/merge_requests/...

...while Chef's CEO openly said that they will not renew their contract with ICE and CBP, as well as to donate the equivalent revenue of their current contracts to charities that help people impacted: https://blog.chef.io/an-important-update-from-chef/

> After deep introspection and dialog within Chef, we will not renew our current contracts with ICE and CBP when they expire over the next year. Chef will fulfill our full obligations under the current contracts.

Re:Developers join call for GitHub to cancel its ICE contract by claudeganon on Wednesday December 04, 2019 @02:19PM (#21705895)
I’m fairly certain the actions themselves of the entity being protested are what’s driving the discontent here. People are upset about Hong Kong protestors being tortured and disappeared by police just like they are about migrants being treated the same way by ICE.

It’s not it being your own government vs. a foreign government that’s at issue. It’s what they’re doing to people.

[dead]
Re:Developers join call for GitHub to cancel its ICE contract by lykr0n on Wednesday December 04, 2019 @12:21PM (#21704283)
that's a good way to get people to care about the points you're making.
[dead]
Re:Developers join call for GitHub to cancel its ICE contract by LiNeXT on Wednesday December 04, 2019 @12:37PM (#21704525)
Selling a piece of enterprise software != alignment. It's a sale, nothing more.